Guild Wars 2 Fashionable Pants Heavy Armor
Anet, I take searched high and depression without success. I am trying to find unproblematic "pants" for my human being elementalist.
Nevertheless, the but set I found that I liked, was the Aetherblade heavy armor. But discovered my graphic symbol cannot use the peel because she is a light armor wearer. Why does it announced differently on light armor wearer? In my stance it should wait the same regardless of what level of armor my character actually can use.
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/hot/can-t-use-Aetherblade-Heavy-Armor-style/first#post6003483
The heavy set gives me the look I am afterward, but for my calorie-free armor I get a skirt? If yous await at all these "lite" armor sets, y'all cannot run into any simple pants anywhere.
https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Human_female_light_armor
i utilise the genie pants from the embroidered set. maybe illustrious would also piece of work
Female cloths are crap. Clearly the target demographic is 14-18 yr erstwhile males.
I gave up long agone and just bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the cause of girl gamers is served by this sexist bias. Merely my stance.
Guardian, Engineer, Elementalist, Mesmer, Thief, Necro
One of the good things about female Charr using male armor is that the male light armor Ascalonian pants is a simple, simple pair of pants with no skirt or strange flaps hanging down. I previewed every pair of pants on my female Charr ele and found that one solitary pair of pants that didn't get on my fretfulness with excess fabric hanging off it or having weird holes in it.
No such luck on my female person human Mesmer. I put the jungle outfit on her.
Exist careful what you ask for
ANet may give information technology to you.
But that is not the look I desire. Currently I have been using this look. Illustrious I think is the name of it. But yet, the "short shorts" over tights is still non what I want. They too have featherbrained lace things around them and just looks stupid, but it is improve than all the other idiotic leggings I have looked at.
Calling a piece of gear "pants" or "leggings" begs the question when y'all preview information technology and information technology looks like a tutu, brusk brim or front open skirt that looks like it came directly out of a bordello.
Medium legs actually look like pants on my female, but considering I wear calorie-free gear, they won't work.
Attachments:
(edited by lynspottery.6529)
Female cloths are crap. Clearly the target demographic is 14-18 yr old males.
I gave upward long ago and just bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the cause of girl gamers is served by this sexist bias. Just my opinion.
Girl gamers…well, I don't quite fit that category since I am over 70 years of age. I am beyond frilly lacy stuff that I see.
(edited by lynspottery.6529)
I need pants for my mesmer too. I wish I tin can use some of medium skins similar Ley-Line pants on her. I currently employ the pants from AC dungeon because it looks a scrap like leggings and the curt brim slice doesn't ruined the look that much.
I think the simply option is the embroidered leggings.
But that's just from retentivity, and I've ever wanted skirts for my low-cal armoured girls and so I wasn't specifically looking for trousers. (I accept the contrary problem, I desire but a brim on one of them but so many seem to be a skirt or robe over trousers or leggings.)
Danielle Aurorel, Dear Dragon Nosotros Got Your Cookies [Nom], Pathos (EU).
"Life's a journeying, not a destination."
Those are Exalted leggings not Illustrious. Personally I prefer the Illustrious await. I likewise have a ready using the Incarnate leggings which, despite having those wings, actually look a lot like leather pants.
Female cloths are crap. Clearly the target demographic is fourteen-18 year sometime males.
I gave upwardly long agone and simply bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the cause of girl gamers is served by this sexist bias. Just my stance.
Hey, nothing against that neat outfuit. I honey it and its slap-up to use the legendary (high defense) mini skirts on my xxx same looking female chars ingame. Of course ever with mini kasemeer in her bikini.
PS: 26 twelvemonth old male person gamer
and yes I don't either care if yous use only male chars with farens legendary titan speedos
IGN: Euer Verderben
[RUC] Riverside United Corps! For Riverside!
Female cloths are crap. Clearly the target demographic is 14-18 twelvemonth old males.
I gave up long ago and just bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the cause of girl gamers is served by this sexist bias. But my opinion.
it's only sexist if you lot recollect only females should wear certain clothing.
The only pants I accept found are Ascalon calorie-free pants and Profane pants. On female they look dissimilar.
Here's an original elementary pants pattern I made.Hope you like the colours.
Attachments:
-Win a pip,lose a pip,win a pip,lose a pip,lose a pip,
lose a pip,win 2 pips,lose a pip,lose a pip…………..-
-Go get Espartz.-
Did yous go to your bank and hit wardrobe and so filter by light pants and preview all the electric current options? Some you may have to do special missions for, but if its worth the look it'southward worth the time. You may also discover that certain pants look completely different when paired with a unlike summit.
I for one tried to create the Trinity await on i of my human ncromancers and nailed almost everything except the trench coat, it's close only not perfect.
Sorrows Furnace
[HaHa] Chancy Hallucination
Female cloths are crap. Clearly the target demographic is fourteen-18 year former males.
I gave up long agone and just bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the cause of daughter gamers is served by this sexist bias. Only my opinion.
Human female person? Light armor? Congrats! You dress like a prostitute with a crippling lace addiction!
It's not funny, ANet. Seriously, knock information technology off and give them some practical dress without resorting to outfits.
Sarcasm, delivered with a
delicate, brick-like subtlety.
There are pants. Yous accept to have minor flaws like i have with what i want. Devout and student armor sets have pants and the ascalonian performer have leggings at the very least. And op dont bother bringing in sexism cause that is a foolish acusation considering there are male armor sets similar gladiator that show enough of skin and the chief characters are lesbians and accept the largest spotlight…
Well to be fair the male lite armor characters are stuck with a lot of dresses too …
In that location are pants. Y'all have to accept minor flaws like i have with what i want. Devout and student armor sets take pants and the ascalonian performer accept leggings at the very least. And op dont bother bringing in sexism cause that is a foolish acusation because at that place are male armor sets like gladiator that show plenty of skin and the primary characters are lesbians and have the largest spotlight…
If and when I utilize the term sexist, I am referring to a female person wanting to clothing "pants," only to be given short skirts, tutus, or partial brim with front end cut open to bear witness legs with garters and stockings (this last particular looks to me like a bordello outfit from centuries ago). Such outfits are not past pick, merely foisted on the thespian under a false tag.
I am not against women, or men for that affair, who want to wear such outfits, but to foist the look onto something that clearly says "pants" or "leggings" in the tool tip and have it morph into something else entirely, is my argument.
Also, I find information technology odd that if you lot look at those same "pants" or "leggings" on a female who can just vesture medium or heavy gear, they await exactly like what the tool tip says they are. But these very aforementioned items morph on a light armor wearer? Delight ….I do not wish to wear such things.
Why is it then hard to understand that when you have a tool tip saying "pants" or "leggings" that you actually look to run across that on your female calorie-free armor?
Information technology would offend me to no end going into Macy's to purchase "pants" or "leggings," so picking up said particular to try on in the dressing room, only to find I am now wearing a skirt, tutu or brim with front cut open accompanied by garters and hose?
I remember Macy's would land in court for fake advertisement at the very to the lowest degree.
But my point hither is: Why on earth can't female light armor wearers become the aforementioned look from "pants" or "leggings" as their medium and heavy armor counterpart compatriots?
(edited past lynspottery.6529)
I listed several armor sets that include leg coverage. I volition say information technology again more clearly. YOU have to accept SHORTCOMINGS to your expectations like I HAVE with the realistic looking armor ready i take tried to put together for my master. Aught is perfect unless you tin design information technology for yourself.
I agree with OP. There are no actual pants for light female humans. The closest thing in that location is are the ascalon pants, which I have my norn ele wearing, simply it still has some kind of brim type of thing. Anyway, information technology's the only thing that feels remotely like wearing actual pants.
Mesmers in gw1 got pants, why no light pants in gw2?
Attachments:
Hither's the ones I recollect piece of work all-time if you're looking to avoid a skirt on a human/norn/sylvari female person in light armour. (I was going to factor in cultural armour but it doesn't look similar any of them are appropriate anyhow.)
Ascalonian Performer Pants
Has a close plumbing equipment mini brim at the pinnacle just it's easy to dye it to await like function of the tiptop, and otherwise looks similar trousers.
Land Pants
Equally above – although the brim is longer than on Ascalonian Performer then it may non exist ideal, but it's probably the near widely available choice.
Embroidered Pants
IMO the best selection for this purpose. They look like amorphous 'genie pants'. At that place's a separate piece on the top (which again tin can be dyed separately) but it's not specially noticeable. Some people have a trouble with the fact that in that location are pocket-sized openings on the hips merely I'd hardly consider it revealing.
Exalted Pants
They look like leggings with a 1/two skirt/'butt cape' downwardly 1 side. Probably the fanciest option, lots of lace.
Incarnate Pants
They take huge loops of textile to either side, but I've seen some people put together looks that brand that less noticeable and otherwise they're just trousers.
Primative Legwraps
There'south a flap of cloth sticking out at the back just otherwise they're apparently leggings. The catchy function is that they include a line of skulls hanging from the belt and, as the name implies, the overall look is very rough and primeval, so it may only work on sure characters.
Profane Pants
In the plus column they share the top spot with the Embroidered Pants as the ones with absolutely no skirt, greatcoat, flap or any other kind of fabric hanging below the waistline. In the minus cavalcade the large gap between the crotch role and the leggings manages to make them seem revealing and the strappy leather/metallic leggings expect probably but suits certain characters. (I'grand trying to be objective here only I have to acknowledge they're probably my least favourite light armour.)
Student Leggings
Very similar to Ascalonian and State Pants. A short skirt (same length as Country in the back, Ascalonian in the front) and otherwise plain leggings. (One downwardly side is that the skirt function shares ane dye channel with the leggings then it's a bit harder to make them look completely split.
So in summary my favourites are the Embroidered Pants, followed past Ascalonian Performer and Student. Embroidered and Student take the benefit of being very easy to get (Embroidered is 1st tier crafted, worth about 3s on the TP and Pupil is 1st tier looted).
If I was going for a casual, modernish expect I'd use Embroidered and combine them with something like the Land Coat or Magician Glaze.
And if that'south not enough surrender and get the Jungle outfit. (Although as someone who typically wears jeans and t-shirts in existent life the Embroidered/Country combo actually looks more like something I'd wear. The jungle outfit has too many things strapped to it.)
Danielle Aurorel, Honey Dragon We Got Your Cookies [Nom], Desolation (EU).
"Life's a journey, not a destination."
I listed several armor sets that include leg coverage. I volition say it again more clearly. YOU have to have SHORTCOMINGS to your expectations like I Have with the realistic looking armor set i have tried to put together for my main. Nothing is perfect unless yous can design it for yourself.
…sigh, if folks did not accost this "oversight" in lite armor gear, Anet volition probably continue to Non offer something a lot of players might desire.
Information technology does nothing to ignore and accept annihilation. If suggestions are made and Anet actually looks into them, there just might be some changes made. After all, they have made changes earlier.
I have been trying to snag together dissimilar items for an outfit. I've come close to what I want simply its not perfect ..except for the missing "pants" or "leggings" consequence, its shut but as they say, "no cigar" yet.
As well, if I go with an "outfit" I am stuck with the entire thing non just one part of the outfit. Information technology would be nice if we could separate bottoms, from tops in order to mix and match what we desire from outfits, just I gather the reason Anet created "outfits" to begin with was to offer a complete look without having to cobble together dissimilar items for it.
Women in pants, men in skin-baring armors and outfits. Not going to happen, because I suspect someone at ANet feels these are somehow psychologically threatening.
Keeper of Buns of Men, a GW2 Tumblr Blog.
Yeah female light armor "variety" is quite limited. I ended upwards with only Forgemans considering that was the just "armor" that truly looked like armor.
Attachments:
Just let me know when the PVE/PVP skill separation happens.
Can Engi please accept more than one viable skill set in PVE? Turrets perhaps?
Lynn i just want to brand sure you understand AMPA brought upwardly sexism. Your post is reasonable. The only issue is that anet disagrees with your assessment of their armor availability. They want armor weights to look different from each other hence the aetherblade situation. But posting requests for normal skintight pants like on the aeather heavy armorset is reasonable. The amorphous embroidered dont adapt your manner. Just go on posting and letting anet know your desires and DONT bring in stupid arguments like ampa did. Anet is a perfectly off-white visitor that panders enough as information technology is.
Embroidered pants are probably the closest matter to just pants you can go for light armor that are pretty basic unless you lot managed to grab Conjuror pants or unlock some of yous HoM and grab the Heritage Pare.
IGN: Soren the Always Lost
Gaiscioch Family [GSCH]
The armors transform depending the sexual practice of the grapheme wearing it. That is quintaessential sexism.
"But trouble with the Engineer is
that information technology makes every other class in the game deadening to play."
Hawks
Bringing sexism up equally an issue in this videogame is across hare-brained. This game goes beyond pandering for sensitive people. Having your own opinion on the matter is fine. Acusing anet of sexism is not fine because they offer a broad variety of options in their videogame they own under their rights.
Female cloths are crap. Conspicuously the target demographic is 14-18 twelvemonth quondam males.
I gave upward long ago and simply bought a Jungle Explorer Outfit.
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Jungle_Explorer_Outfit
I don't believe that the crusade of girl gamers is served past this sexist bias. Just my opinion.
I know, right! It'south incommunicable to be female and like those skimpy outfits.
Wait a second, that'southward sexist. It'south non and then easy these days where literally everything is offensive.
Lol yeah definitely non easy. Especially the people that outset problems over equality when the opportunity is there for everyone equally. If y'all dont take the opportunity thats your mistake. Just in regards for female person light armor. Its all opinionated. I see a squeamish variety in what is available and that base will only grow with fourth dimension.
There's a difference between skimpy vs. full coverage and having a range of article of clothing styles.
If all you're concerned most is how much skin is showing I actually think GW2'due south female person armour gives you a great range of options. Light armour for example has everything from Devout (where only your face is visible) to Apprentice (which is basically a strappy bikini) and if you mix and lucifer pieces you lot can get even more options (eastward.g. devout top with something like the Aurora leggings which are a mini skirt and tights for something that's still full coverage but less overtly modest.)
But nigh all of the armour on offer is the same way – in this case a top and skirt or skirt/leggings philharmonic. For medium armour it'southward long coats and trousers (in contrast to light about 90% of medium leg armour is plain trousers) and for heavy of course it'south plate/chain/scale mail.
(There's also a serious lack of revealing male armour. Autonomously from a few heavy pieces you'll have a difficult time even having bear artillery and manifestly shorts take however to be invented in Tyria.)
Danielle Aurorel, Dear Dragon We Got Your Cookies [Nom], Pathos (European union).
"Life'southward a journey, not a destination."
And every bit a upshot, light armor I often resort to using outfits.
Too much light armor resembles curtains more than actual clothing.
For one time you have tasted flight y'all will walk the world with your eyes turned skywards,
for there you lot have been and at that place you will long to return.
And equally a result, light armor I often resort to using outfits.
As well much light armor resembles curtains more than than actual clothing.
OMG………when I read your mail service, I turned to look at my windows….which, incidentally, really are covered with translucent sheers. But, the image of my ele wearing curtains is definitely cringeworthy.
lol
And as a event, light armor I oftentimes resort to using outfits.
Too much light armor resembles curtains more than actual wear.
Sorry, simply information technology has to exist linked:
Sarcasm, delivered with a
delicate, brick-like subtlety.
There's a difference between skimpy vs. total coverage and having a range of vesture styles.
If all you're concerned about is how much skin is showing I actually recall GW2's female armour gives you a great range of options. Calorie-free armour for case has everything from Devout (where only your face up is visible) to Apprentice (which is basically a strappy bikini) and if you mix and match pieces you can get even more options (e.g. devout peak with something like the Aurora leggings which are a mini brim and tights for something that'south still full coverage but less overtly modest.)
But virtually all of the armour on offer is the aforementioned style – in this instance a superlative and skirt or skirt/leggings combo. For medium armour it's long coats and trousers (in contrast to light near 90% of medium leg armour is plain trousers) and for heavy of course it's plate/concatenation/scale postal service.
(There's also a serious lack of revealing male armour. Apart from a few heavy pieces you'll have a hard time even having carry artillery and plainly shorts take yet to exist invented in Tyria.)
This is sadly very true. Unfortunately, the Devout style also includes a skirt.
As for male armor, I have seen a few characters running around with crossed straps for tops and the speedo bottoms. Not sure how they accomplished that, but it was interesting.
I know a lot of movies with "heros" tend to have skimpy male attire for their costumes, only I've not seen many reproduced in this game.
And as a outcome, low-cal armor I often resort to using outfits.
Too much light armor resembles defunction more actual clothing.
Sorry, but it has to exist linked:
I recollect that episode. I laughed till I cried…she carried it off so well too.
There's a deviation between skimpy vs. full coverage and having a range of clothing styles.
If all you're concerned about is how much skin is showing I actually think GW2's female armour gives you a great range of options. Light armour for example has everything from Devout (where just your face is visible) to Apprentice (which is basically a strappy bikini) and if you mix and match pieces you tin get even more options (e.one thousand. devout summit with something like the Aurora leggings which are a mini brim and tights for something that'southward yet full coverage but less overtly modest.)
Simply virtually all of the armour on offer is the aforementioned fashion – in this example a elevation and brim or brim/leggings philharmonic. For medium armour it's long coats and trousers (in dissimilarity to light about 90% of medium leg armour is plain trousers) and for heavy of course information technology's plate/chain/scale post.
(At that place'due south likewise a serious lack of revealing male armour. Apart from a few heavy pieces you'll take a hard time fifty-fifty having behave arms and apparently shorts have notwithstanding to exist invented in Tyria.)
This is sadly very truthful. Unfortunately, the Devout manner besides includes a brim.
Every bit for male armor, I take seen a few characters running around with crossed straps for tops and the speedo bottoms. Not certain how they achieved that, just it was interesting.
I know a lot of movies with "heros" tend to have skimpy male attire for their costumes, but I've not seen many reproduced in this game.
I think some people use a 'work around' where they pick shut-fitting armour and dye it to look similar their characters skin.
Danielle Aurorel, Dear Dragon We Got Your Cookies [Nom], Pathos (Eu).
"Life's a journey, non a destination."
OK, last comment from me.
Which of these women exercise you want to see continuing next to you lot in Dragon'south Stand? Pants or no pants?
Strong female person role models can exist sexy without lace drape outfits.
I personally would prefer to run into whatever of the women wearing pants.
To each their own. Dress you characters every bit y'all wish. I have two males and two females and have fun changing their looks. Simply leveling my female Norn took me through a strange collection of armor that eventually led to the Jungle Explorer Outfit. Hey, that's just me.
Guardian, Engineer, Elementalist, Mesmer, Thief, Necro
Council ministry building shoes can await similar as 'pants' in combination with some other clothing.
(for example the ascended skin for pants + the quango ministry building shoes ).
I wish I could afford whatsoever ascended gear…I just beggared myself for ascended weapons. But that still doesn't address my initial concern. Why don't light armor for females accept apparently pants?
I took a screen shot of the costume armor that my Rift Mage wears in game. If that game tin do the pants theme, then I know GW2 can practise information technology besides. This is similar to what I am attempting to find (non necessarily with the hat).
The gear she is wearing actually are separate pieces I chose to achieve the expect. I practise non run into any reason why GW2 cannot do something similar.
Attachments:
"Also, if I become with an "outfit" I am stuck with the unabridged thing not just one part of the outfit. It would be nice if we could split bottoms, from tops in order to mix and match what we want from outfits, but I get together the reason Anet created "outfits" to begin with was to offer a complete look without having to cobble together different items for it."
Yeah we probably shouldn't bring up that entirely unlike and 100+ page thread about Town Clothes…
Anyhow, I besides wish there were more "pants" available for calorie-free armor users in improver to just more armor sets in full general…for everyone. I mean I thought the generic character models were for people who had a hard fourth dimension knowing the armor besides as graphics quality…I dont see how anyone who doesn't use them would care if my ele looks like thief just throws fire.
In GW they enforced the differentiation of classes past armor type just it had a silhouette to it and there were no outfits immune in PvP. In GW2 you can wear outfits and almost armor is meaningless for looks since I doubt anyone relies on it every bit an identifier of a grade.
I actually wish they would just cease using information technology as justification for the mode they do it. I'thousand fine with keeping the stardom between light, medium and heavy armor but stop making all heavy sets wait similar they are metal plated turtles. Afterwards a while I began to despise the party dresses, masquerade costumes and noble finery that seemed the merely option for my ele who grew up on the streets fighting for her survival.
After you posted your character I tried this…
Attachments:
Necrotic that is pretty close..although I call back the hat has a scrap more than at the meridian than my coolie one and your outfit still has that curt skirt over the summit of the pants.
All the same, It would be really cool if they had the Vampire hunter chapeau and costumes.
Attachments:
(edited past lynspottery.6529)
Yep, the art blueprint for light AND medium armor is absolute CRAP. Most of it is pathetically distressing. It looks like a turn down pile. Heavy has proficient choices though.
GW1'south armor was much amend.
My dog could design better armor for light and medium than the garbage choices we accept in GW2.
They desire you to purchase outfits but they suck besides. Especially since you tin can't mix and match pieces from outfits.
In every way shape and class the "Play every bit yous want" manifesto IS A LIE.
(edited by Grim W.3194)
And as a issue, light armor I ofttimes resort to using outfits.
Too much light armor resembles curtains more than than actual clothing.
Distressing, only it has to be linked:
And that really does look like Gw2 armor xD
For in one case you lot have tasted flight y'all will walk the earth with your optics turned skywards,
for there you accept been and at that place y'all will long to render.
Something like this?
Attachments:
Drop Acid Not Bombs (Richie Hawtin)
Something like this?
Didn't read the actual OP? That's medium armor, not Light.
Profane looks pretty pant-ish – well it looks more similar stocking with a garter belt to be more than precise. But yes, pants for calorie-free armor females would be corking – like the Ascalonian performer pants for males.
And now that we are on this subject area, could we get some female light armor footwear that isn't boots and doesn't expect like clogs? Because, honestly, well-nigh of the calorie-free armor footwear clashes with the residue horribly. You get your female character all nice and gauzy and princessly with glittering wings… and wearing boots or clogs.
0 Response to "Guild Wars 2 Fashionable Pants Heavy Armor"
Post a Comment